User talk:Ras67/Archive 7
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, GMGtalk 21:18, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:First 8K Video from Space - Ultra HD VP9.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Placebo Kickers Hamburg.png
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Placebo Kickers Hamburg.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Placebo Kickers Hamburg.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 11:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Apoorv awards.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:PaulZadro.png
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:PaulZadro.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:PaulZadro.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
— Ирука13 12:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Tippfehler
Hallo. In der Grafik rechts ist ein Tippfehler enthalten, nämlich "Konstistenz" anstelle von "Konsistenz". Ich kann's nicht ändern, daher mach bitte Du. mfg --Buchdrucker (talk) 10:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Ja, das war mir schon nach dem Umbau in SVG aufgefallen, da es aber bis jetzt keinen gestört hatte, habe ich es so gelassen. Die Buchstaben haben eine separate Umrahmung und sind durch die Konvertierung Pfade geworden, so dass das Löschen und Umrücken ziemlich tricky sind. Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 15:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:US-EVA30-Edited RAW XDCAM 720p.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Maria Nikolaevna of Russia in a traditional dress.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Wolcott (talk) 17:35, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Used on own page?
Hello! Both of these files: File:Atlas Typhoeus Prometheus.pdf and File:Atlas Typhoeus Prometheus.png indicate under "File usage on Commons" that they are used on their own respective file page, however I cannot find Atlas Typhoeus Prometheus.pdf in the source of File:Atlas Typhoeus Prometheus.pdf and vice versa. I'm confused. Do you know why this is as the uploader?Jonteemil (talk) 05:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:NICER Charts the Area Around a New Black Hole.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
File:OECD member states map.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ratherous (talk) 17:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Герб Башкирской АССР в 1925-1978 гг small.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Валко (talk) 06:07, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Bassr25.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Валко (talk) 05:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Gerbbassr1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Валко (talk) 05:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Герб Башкирской АССР в 1925-1978 гг.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Валко (talk) 05:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Ruth censored.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FredWalsh (talk) 18:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Societas S. Francisci Salesii.png
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Societas S. Francisci Salesii.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Societas S. Francisci Salesii.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ganímedes (talk) 01:54, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Louis Ferdinand of Prussia with wife Kyra Romanova (1938) 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Buidhe (talk) 20:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Frage zu einem Bild
Hallo Ras67,
ich weiß nicht, ob Du mir weiterhelfen kannst aber Du bist mir mal bei einem ähnlich gelagerten Bild (File:Plauen Altes Rathaus 1945.JPG) "untergekommen". ;-)
Ich kategorisiere in unregelmäßigen Abständen die Dateien, die in der Kategorie "Plauen" aufschlagen. Nun bin ich mir bei der Datei File:Rittergut Adlershof Umweltzentrum Oberlauterbach Vogtland NUZ - Das verschwundene Vogtland © Jens Reiher.jpg nicht sicher, ob das urheberrechtsmäßig OK ist. Kannst Du da vielleicht mal "vorbeischauen" und beurteilen, ob das einen Löschantrag wert ist?
Vielen Dank und Viele Grüße N8eule78 (talk) 16:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo N8eule78, speziell das oben verlinkte Bild sehe ich sehr kritisch, weil wir hier 1. einen gewissen "Jens Reiher" oder doch "Rittergut Adlershof" als angeblichen Urheberrechtsinhaber haben und dann ist da 2. noch das alte Bild was schätzungsweise aus den 1920er Jahren sein könnte. Jens Reiher oder das Rittergut Adlershof haben wahrscheinlich keine Rechte an diesem Bild und es könnte nur hier bleiben, wenn Jens Reiher oder das Rittergut per OTRS nachweisen, dass der wirkliche Fotograf mindestens 70+1 Jahre tot ist oder sie die Urheberrechte vererbt bekommen haben. Auch alle anderen Fotos vom "Rittergut Adlershof" bräuchten eigentlich eine Bestätigung, dass das alles seine Richtigkeit hat und die Bilder tatsächlich vom "Vorstand" des Ritterguts kommen und nicht vom "Lehrling" ohne Wissen und Einwilligung des Vorstands (in dem Sinne). Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 17:41, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo Ras67,
- Vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung. Ich habe den Nutzer mal angesprochen. Mal sehen, ob da was passiert ;-)
- Viele Grüße
- N8eule78 (talk) 10:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Da Rittergut Adlershof sofort reagiert hat, sollte man davon ausgehen können, dass es mit den anderen Bildern seine Ordnung hat. Viele Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 13:05, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Fairepart (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 10:24, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Somaliland location map.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lasunncty (talk) 10:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
File:African Elephant distribution map.svg
Hello.
Can you add South Sudan in File:African Elephant distribution map.svg you uploaded and as well as in File:Distribution M. tricuspis.png, File:Distribution M. tricuspis.svg, File:Distribution P. aurata.svg, File:Distribution G. senegalensis.svg, File:Distribution P. africanus.svg?
I am adding South Sudan (as well as Montenegro and other possible missing updates) in the PNG maps in Category:Maps needing South Sudan political boundaries and then remove this category after updating them. There were close to 1100 maps since I started to update these files on 1 March 2018, now it is reduced to less than 522 maps, but there is a long way to go.
Unfortunately I don't know how to edit SVG maps myself, that is why I asked you.
Yours sincerely, Maphobbyist (talk) 10:10, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Xxxxxx xxxxx x xx x.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:03, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
SpaceX Pad Abort Test Patch
Hi, I saw that you uploaded the Crew-1 mission patch. Did you digitize it yourself? If so, could you do it on this one: https://imgur.com/2MsV5Ea? It's from SpaceX's pad abort test. Thank you. --AFLBulawan (talk) 19:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @AFLBulawan: I've only converted the Crew-1 mission patch from the JPG into the PNG format who is better applicable for Commons. The SpaceX Pad Abort Test Patch is unfortunately copyrighted by SpaceX and not free available for us to release it here. Warm regards --Ras67 (talk) 10:34, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
File:Atlas V rocket with commercial crew capsule (concept).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
— Huntster (t @ c) 10:58, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
File:NekljudovValLeo-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Bundesarchiv B 285 Bild-04413, KZ Auschwitz, Einfahrt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Spasimir (talk) 06:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lennart Bernadotte.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 12:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Supermoon over the the US Marine Corps War Memorial in Arlington, Va.jpg
- File:Supermoon over the the US Marine Corps War Memorial in Arlington, Virginia.jpg Binksternet (talk) 23:17, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Raina Rose.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 09:21, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!
Welcome to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020
India |
Hello Ras67/Archive 7!
From September 1 to September 30, 2020, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the tenth time. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year. You might remember this event as you had participated in one of the previous editions. We will be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record our monuments for future generations and win exciting prizes! You can find more details in this page.
Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Great Lakes Naval Hospital - American Red Cross October 24, 1966 Letter of thanks to Jennie and Terrie Frankel for entertaining wounded servicemen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:23, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Vietnam Twins w soldier holding tamboreen.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Europe from Space in 4K.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Ashu Sharma.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 14:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Contactangle.pdf
- File:Norman Zabusky with images and space-time diagrams.pdf
- File:Present Dai with dawat emblem.pdf
Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 14:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Caucasus-ethnic en.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bogazicili (talk) 04:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
A beer for your NASA pictures!
Was digging through NASA images for find some old pictures of John Young and felt frustrated that nobody had uploaded them, which made me wonder if current photos were getting uploaded or if they would be lost to the backwaters of NASA websites. About 5 minutes after I resolved that I wouldn't let this happen and I would find a way to make sure current NASA images get uploaded, I found that you have already been undertaking this task for years. Nice work! Balon Greyjoy (talk) 09:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC) |
- Thank you, but currently it is frustrating to upload NASA images from Flickr. The tool Flickr2Commons doesn't work because of the wrong “CC BY-NC-ND 2.0” licence on the pictures. So i have to upload every single picture manually. But mass bot uploads are also the horror. I capitulated four years ago during the categorizing with these images where originally uloaded by somebody directly into the category Apollo 16. Best regards ;-) Ras67 (talk) 21:33, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Gettyimages
hi Ras67, I am writing to ask you how do you keep the original size of the gettyimages files ??, see me to remove the watermark from the paintings I use (https://tomato.to/)
but when it comes time to etrarre the portrait without watermarks, the problem is that the portrait keeps the old walls of the free version of gettyimages, no later than 10 ?? . she uses makeup for the sizes--Franz von Pawłew (talk) 14:46, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- How can i help? With an explanation of my work modes? Please provide a link to an explicit file, where i can help. Warm regards --Ras67 (talk) 12:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- you could enter the original size of this file:
1) file 2) file 3) file 4) file 5) file 6) file 7) file 8) file 9) file 10)file 11) file --Franz von Pawłew (talk) 11:31, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- OK, but i have to do also other things so i process these images step by step. The image from Alamy is rather destroyed by the marks and not to process from me. --Ras67 (talk) 11:51, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- thank you, but do you know some user, or a program that takes care of the removal of the alamy watermark, I ask you, because finally after years we have all solved the problem of gettyimages together, but alamy still remains problematic--Franz von Pawłew (talk) 12:35, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Alamy images are cruel, the only possibility is to retouch every single watermark element. It would be a little easier when you could provide an other version from the same image without or other placed watermarks. Tomato.to doesn't work with this image. --Ras67 (talk) 12:52, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Excalibur Almaz spacecraft.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
— Huntster (t @ c) 00:15, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Verandah Café.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
83.33.146.103 08:16, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
File:The Kali idol @ Dakshineshwar.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Tamravidhir (talk) 18:11, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Maa Bhavatarini's face @ Dakshineshwar Kali Temple.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Tamravidhir (talk) 18:19, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zvezda under construction.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Buidhe (talk) 10:37, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
ISS Visiting Vehicles 2020-11-17.png vs. Expedition 64 - Status arrival of SpaceX Crew-1.jpg
Hello. Why are you deleting older file in lossless format in favor of newer JPEG? Problem with JPEG images containing sharp edges, e.g. text labels and other artificial drawings, is that even that they may not contain visible artifacts in original resolution, their low-res previews are also going to be JPEG encoded (and so artifact-prone). On the other hand, PNG low-res previews will stay to be PNG-encoded, which is safer, regarding to artifacts. That's why I've uploaded that particular image in (size optimized) PNG format. --Teslaton (talk) 22:41, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Your PNG version is a inferior 256 color version with retaining JPG artifacts from the source JPG. When you would have the original image with all colors and without artifacts then your upload would be OK. The subsequent converting of a lossy JPG to a lossless PNG without further improvement only for better? thumbnailing is not recommended. Warm regards. --Ras67 (talk) 22:55, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Again, I'm not talking about artifacts in that fullres image itself (yes, without access to lossless original of that rendering, they are already there). If there was a way to prevent lossy serialization of generated thumbnails (of JPEG originals), there will be no need to do this, requesting their thumbnail in PNG format would be sufficient. But without that possibility, uploading original in lossless format (even if created from already lossy encoded version) is the way to force that. --Teslaton (talk) 23:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- OK, is that proceeding covered by a guideline? --Ras67 (talk) 23:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Dual PNG/JPEG uploads seems to be covered here: Commons:File_types#PNG/JPEG, but mainly the opposite situation – keeping extra JPEG version of PNG original to take an advantage of JPEG thumbnail sharpening:
- "On Wikipedia (and all other MediaWiki installations, as discussed in phab:T192744), PNG thumbnails are not sharpened, but JPEG thumbnails are. For more complicated images, such as photographs, engravings, and such, PNG displays an inferior thumbnail. However, the major problem with JPEG is that, as a lossy file format, it cannot be repeatedly edited, even at the best quality settings. As such, even where the PNG thumbnail is inferior, it’s recommended to upload a PNG as well, and link between the PNG and JPEG copies using {{PNG with JPEG version}}. An exception is where the original image is already in JPEG; in such cases, there’s no reason to provide a PNG copy."
- and:
- "Note that currently JPEG thumbnails receive extra sharpening, while PNG thumbnails don't. Hence, uploading in both formats may be a good idea if the PNG thumbnails look a bit blurry. Use {{JPEG version of PNG}} on the JPEG versions of a PNG flagged as {{PNG with JPEG version}}.").
- Ok, I've compared look&feel of differently sized thumbnails of this rendering here and must admit that there's no serious issue with JPEG artifacts under current thumbnail post-processing and JPEG quality settings. I think we can go ahead with JPEG version only. --Teslaton (talk) 07:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Dual PNG/JPEG uploads seems to be covered here: Commons:File_types#PNG/JPEG, but mainly the opposite situation – keeping extra JPEG version of PNG original to take an advantage of JPEG thumbnail sharpening:
- Thank you for your efforts to clear the situation! Take you care to remove your PNG? --Ras67 (talk) 18:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- OK, is that proceeding covered by a guideline? --Ras67 (talk) 23:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Again, I'm not talking about artifacts in that fullres image itself (yes, without access to lossless original of that rendering, they are already there). If there was a way to prevent lossy serialization of generated thumbnails (of JPEG originals), there will be no need to do this, requesting their thumbnail in PNG format would be sufficient. But without that possibility, uploading original in lossless format (even if created from already lossy encoded version) is the way to force that. --Teslaton (talk) 23:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:KRASKA1.png
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:KRASKA1.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ytoyoda (talk) 15:30, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
File:United States Space Force.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:00, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Caliph Abdulmecid II of the Ottoman Empire.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:58, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Great Arms of Kingdom of Svartland.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kongeriket Svartland (talk) 03:38, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Roman Shukhevych UIA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Doctor Architect (talk) 14:52, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Marie-kresbapodruh-1-.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mutter Erde (talk) 10:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
In the map of the participating countries Sierre Leone is missing; should be in purple as it was a first time participant. --Proofreader (talk) 01:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
File:MoonLanderLola16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Zamonin (talk) 09:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
It's Wiki Loves Food time!
Wiki Loves Food 2021
India |
Hello Ras67/Archive 7!
Do you roam around in search of delicious mouth-watering foods and take photographs of them before you put them into your mouth? Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India photo-competition is then waiting for you! Participate in the competition from March 15 to April 14 this year, photograph and upload all kinds of foods and beverages originated from or found in Indian sub-continent and get a chance to win exciting prizes!
-- Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India team
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Soyuz patch
Hi Ras67! They posted the artwork from the Soyuz MS-18 patch on CollectSpace! I would upload it, but seems that every time I upload a patch it demands more work, like here. Thanks, Erick Soares3 (talk) 15:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Kosovo uranium NATO bombing1999.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
89.210.189.77 15:34, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Brian Kelsey.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
mattbr 07:27, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Khouribga خريبكة النافورة الكبيرة La grande Fountain AZ.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
A1Cafel (talk) 12:53, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
File:2017 Tijuana Mexico.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Askeuhd (talk) 17:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Nominated Deletions vlvescovo Submissions to Wiki Commons
Hi Ras67.
The two photos that you recently nominated for deletion due to lack of copyright authority has been addressed. I am not particularly practiced in how to respond to these queries but am trying to address the concerns. The photographer of the two photos nominated, Ms. Tamara Stubbs, was working for me during the research expedition when the photos were taken. She has granted formal transfer of all copyrights to the photos, which allows me to provide them to Wiki Media Commons for free and unrestricted use.
I sent the pdf files authorizing the copyright transfer to permissions-commons but am happy to send them to you directly if you would like to review them. I just need to know an email of where else to send the proof of transfer. Thank you. Vlvescovo (talk) 19:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your quick response, but i'm not an OTRS member and i can not review your licences. This do only the OTRS volunteers. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 01:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Crew 1
Where's crew 1 in the expedition portrait even when Shannon in the initial commander of ISS during the expedition 65 and their name is in expedition 65 list Chinakpradhan (talk) 17:29, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- She is only a temporary commander till Aki Hoshide arrives and not an official member of Expedition 65. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 18:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
question on your deletion requests
please can you give a clear reason why the two pics are needed to be deleted for europesn section of spacex crew 2 and 3 i cannot understand why it is noted for deletion Chinakpradhan (talk) 13:49, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
i think both esanauts must have a separate identity in the mission. i also saw the esa administrator to wear a alpha patch on the launch and welcome ceremony day instead of spacex crew 2 patch so keeping the image means there is something special about alpha and cosmic kiss that makes them different from spacex missions so i request you to turn down the deletion request for these pics they are important for esa and not representing them on Wikipedia and wikimedia will be a shame that they neglected to add these the significance of the esa portion on Wikipedia and Wikimedia Chinakpradhan (talk) 13:57, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
whether you think i am right or wrong please write it on my talk page but i request you to please express your views clearly Chinakpradhan (talk) 14:00, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Simply the ESA patches are copyrighted and only ESA can determine the use of its possession. See COM:L for media on Commons. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 14:09, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Then what to do know I thought the patch inclusion to be important on wikipedia. Can you suggest a way that i can be allowed by esa Or get the lisence for using the patches again I am waiting for a chance have those important logos again on wikipedia Chinakpradhan (talk) 17:04, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Please give the correct lisence or way to get lisence if you know Chinakpradhan (talk) 17:05, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Ok just you can tell that can i add that image from flickr I found the pic here https://www.flickr.com/photos/europeanspaceagency/50165735801/in/photolist-2kj29UJ-2kx4ujZ-2kUbBNy-2j5VvQf-2jqYvvk-2kUsoY1-2ktnuYd-2kLxMLP-2kUFocA-2kHzVMM-2fh8wnt-2kALnRK-LFyDoD-2kUpL7k-2gj6KHM-2kUnRfk-2kUKnD1-2kUnRff-nZ4Ygc-euNCuB-Dem2uw-2jjJnzw-s1HHue-6YxokZ-KzFm2V https://www.flickr.com/photos/europeanspaceagency/50719575362/in/photolist-2kgV5Hh-2kgQTkM-2kF6wYa-2kF2nfw-2kF5Z23-2kF2nbP-2kF2n8h-2hFagQv-2kgRxJq-iuTwX9-iuT8dY-U2zqGv-iuTRD9-iuTaCq-iuSYPH-iuT4RW-iuSjiV-ivaVDQ-7DF9Go-iuT3TJ-iuT63J-ivaNBK-iuT93S-iuTjZx-iuT8Sb Is this know okay that is not violating esa copyright rules. I asked since I thought that adding images from flickr is not any sort of copyright as everytime when we go to add a flies to Wikimedia we see there written add files from flickr Chinakpradhan (talk) 17:16, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- It's not possible to upload these images to Commons because they are not freely licenced by ESA. You can upload a low resolution version on English Wikipedia under fair use, what is not allowed on Commons. --Ras67 (talk) 17:25, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Ok thanks Chinakpradhan (talk) 17:52, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
File:RavenDB logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Timtrent (talk) 08:48, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cryptic-waveform (talk) 23:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
File:X-59.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
— Huntster (t @ c) 19:27, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Shenzhou-11 mission patch.png
- File:Shenzhou 7 mission patch.png
- File:Shenzhou 6 mission patch.svg
- File:Shenzhou-10.png
Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 13:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, — Huntster (t @ c) 07:08, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Sugarcane Deforestation, Bolivia, 2016-06-15 by Planet Labs.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Elisardojm (talk) 07:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Tiananmen Square, Beijing, China 1988 (1).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
A1Cafel (talk) 14:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Tiananmen Square, Beijing, China 1988 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:43, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Maxinvestigator (talk) 14:58, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Shenzhou 5 insignia.PNG
Template:Autotranslate shizhao (talk) 10:04, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Shenzhou 5 insignia.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Wcam (talk) 11:52, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate 72.20.137.10 21:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate 72.20.137.10 21:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:32, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Template:MOTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:00, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:15, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate JuTa 14:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate JuTa 08:37, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate JuTa 08:37, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Nauka docking
Just as the way you did for pirs undocking https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ISS-65_Pirs_docking_compartment_separates_from_the_Space_Station.jpg#mw-jump-to-license https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ISS-65_Pirs_docking_compartment_separates_from_the_Space_Station.webm please make one pic and video for nauka docking. It will be a great pleasure for me. The like is https://mobile.twitter.com/Space_Station/status/1420748950068285440 please do the needful Chinakpradhan ([[User talk:Chinakpradhan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:23, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Ping you are welcome.
Template:Autotranslate ✗plicit 13:21, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
nauka module
can you voice in this discussion https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2021_August_14#File:Nauka_Module_Launch_Mission_Patch.jpg it kis like the soyuz paatchs as we have no free version i had to upload like that.Chinakpradhan ([[User talk:Chinakpradhan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!
Template:WLMIN2021 appeal header
Hello PAGENAME!
We are excited again to let you know that, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the 12th time this year. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year from September 1 to September 30, 2021. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record and digitally document our monuments for future generations and get a chance to win exciting prizes! You can find more details about the Indian part of the competition in this page. See you in action in few hours!!
Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:26, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine
Привіт!
З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже вдесяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.
Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.
Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.
Цього року вперше будуть окремо виділені фото з повітря (дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо) — у спеціальній номінації «Аерофото». Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі.
Також вперше проводиться спеціальна номінація «Пам'ятки Подесення», знову пройдуть спецномінації «Відео», «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини», «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» та «Via Regia Ukraine». Для участі світлин у цих спецномінаціях не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.
Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.
Приєднуйтеся!
Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.
Важливо! Цього року відбулася адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Однак, ми проводимо конкурс ще за попереднім адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Ми почали роботу над створенням списків з новим поділом, але вона ще не є завершена. Ви можете користуватися тими новими списками, що вже є, якщо потрібно відшукати пам'ятку за новим поділом (деякі ОДА вже почали присилати у такому форматі), але пам'ятайте, що нові списки ще не є повними.
Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmTemplate:@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».17:33, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).
If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні триває до 30 вересня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine is on till September 30
Привіт!
Нагадуємо, що до 30 вересня включно можна вантажити світлини та відео культурної спадщини України до національного етапу міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»!
Зараз Україна посідає 3-є місце за кількістю завантажених світлин, поступаючись Російській Федерації та Німеччині. За першу половину місяця було завантажено світлини пам'яток із усіх регіонів України, але частина із них є дуже погано представлена. Севастополь зараз представлений тільки однією пам'яткою і одним фото, Крим — 12 пам'яток і 51 фото. Детальніше — у таблиці:
Регіон | К-ть пам'яток | К-ть фото |
---|---|---|
Севастополь | 1 | 1 |
АР Крим | 12 | 51 |
Закарпаття | 26 | 96 |
Миколаївщина | 29 | 81 |
Рівненщина | 36 | 186 |
Херсонщина | 36 | 83 |
Житомирщина | 55 | 324 |
Донеччина | 57 | 153 |
Тернопільщина | 62 | 234 |
Буковина | 75 | 220 |
Луганщина | 82 | 90 |
Львівщина | 82 | 351 |
Кіровоградщина | 88 | 181 |
Волинь | 98 | 270 |
Одещина | 115 | 383 |
Сумщина | 129 | 414 |
Дніпропетровщина | 139 | 278 |
Київ | 159 | 248 |
Хмельниччина | 166 | 538 |
Полтавщина | 171 | 594 |
Харківщина | 175 | 625 |
Київщина | 181 | 651 |
Черкащина | 186 | 455 |
Прикарпаття | 240 | 305 |
Вінничина | 242 | 775 |
Запоріжжя | 253 | 317 |
Чернігівщина | 305 | 519 |
Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.
Цього року у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій:
- «Аерофото» — для фото з повітря (зроблені дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо). Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі;
- «Відео» — для відеосюжетів з пам'ятками;
- «Єврейська спадщина» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Млини» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Пам'ятки Подесення» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Via Regia Ukraine» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом 15 населених пунктів, що за цим маршрутом є.
Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.
Приєднуйтеся!
Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmTemplate:@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 18:59, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).
If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.
Template:Autotranslate JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Ankry ([[User talk:Ankry|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:41, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate PlanespotterA320 ([[User talk:PlanespotterA320|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
exploded diagram of ISS
Excellent work on the exploded diagram of International Space Station. In your next revision, please note that the Node 3 is spelled incorrectly. The name should be Tranquility. In the July 2021 version, you have it spelled with two "L." Template:Unsigned2
- I've altered the name to Tranquility, btw the "incorrect spelling" is yet from "ISS configuration 2011-05 en.svg". My doing was only an adaption from this original work, i have never touched this word. Regards --Ras67 ([[User talk:Ras67#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:10, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- I've fixed the 2011-en version. — Huntster (t @ c) 16:09, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Erick Soares3 ([[User talk:Erick Soares3|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Template:Noping.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Template:Noping.
And also:
- File:Expedition 65 inflight crew portrait (2) Klim Shipenko.jpg ( Nominator : Template:Noping | Entry page : Commons:Deletion requests/Expedition 65 inflight crew portrait and derivates )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Askeuhd ([[User talk:Askeuhd|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:04, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate CactiStaccingCrane ([[User talk:CactiStaccingCrane|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Please voice your views
please comment on this one, Ras67. Chinakpradhan ([[User talk:Chinakpradhan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:17, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand
เรียน สมาชิกวิกิมีเดีย
เนื่องจากเราเห็นว่าท่านเคยเข้าร่วมการประกวดรูปถ่ายที่จัดขึ้นโดยวิกิมีเดียประเทศไทย เราจึงอยากเชิญชวนท่านเข้าร่วมการประกวดรูปถ่าย Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand ซึ่งจะจัดขึ้นระหว่างวันที่ 15 พฤศจิกายน – 15 ธันวาคม 2564 นี้ มีรูปแบบในการประกวด 7 หัวข้อ คือ บุคคลในวิทยาศาสตร์ รูปจากกล้องจุลทรรศน์ สื่อที่ไม่ใช่รูปถ่าย รูปชุด สัตว์ป่ากับธรรมชาติ ดาราศาสตร์ และหมวดหมู่ทั่วไป หากท่านมีความสนใจในการเข้าร่วมการประกวด ท่านสามารถไปยังหน้าเว็บเพจ Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand เพื่ออ่านข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมและอัปโหลดไฟล์ของท่านภายในช่วงของการประกวดที่ได้กล่าวไว้ ขอแสดงความนับถือ |
Dear Fellow Wikimedians,
Seeing that you have participated in one or more photo contests organized by Wikimedia Thailand, we would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand which will be held between 15 November – 15 December 2021. There are 7 categories in which you can submit: People in Science, Microscopy images, Non-photographic media, Image sets, Wildlife & nature, Astronomy, and General category. If you are interested in participating, you can visit the web page Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand/en for more information and to upload your files within the period of the contest. Kind Regards, |
--Karto1 ([[User talk:Karto1|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:06, 30 October 2021 (UTC)