Commons:Requests for checkuser
Shortcuts: COM:CHECK • COM:RFCU • COM:SOCK
This is the place to request investigations of abuse of multiple accounts or of other circumstances that require use of checkuser privileges.
Requesting a check
These indicators are used by CheckUsers to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments. | |
---|---|
Request completed | |
Confirmed | Technically indistinguishable |
Likely | Possilikely |
Possible | Unlikely |
Inconclusive | Unrelated |
No action | Stale |
Request declined | |
Declined | Checkuser is not for fishing |
Checkuser is not magic pixie dust. | The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says |
It looks like a duck to me | Checkuser is not a crystal ball. |
Information | |
Additional information needed | Deferred to |
Doing… | Info |
Please do not ask us to run checks without good reason; be aware of the following before requesting a check:
- Checkuser is a last resort for difficult cases; pursue other options first, such as posting on the administrator's noticeboard. (This is not a venue for requesting administrative action such as blocks or file clean-up.)
- Running a check will only be done to combat disruption on Commons, or as required to assist checkuser investigations on other Wikimedia wikis.
- Valid reasons for running a check include, for example: vandalism where a block of the underlying IP or IP range is needed and suspected block evasion, vote-stacking, or other disruption where technical evidence would prevent or reduce further disruption.
- Requests to check accounts already confirmed on other projects may be declined as redundant.
- Requests to run a check on yourself will be declined.
- Evidence is required. When you request a check, you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related.
- Requests to run a check without evidence or with ambiguous reasoning will result in delays or the request not being investigated.
- The privacy policy does not allow us to make a check that has the effect of revealing IP addresses.
Outcome
Responses will be brief in order to comply with Wikimedia privacy policy. Due to technical limitations, results are not always clear. Closed requests are archived after seven days.
Privacy concerns
If you feel that a checkuser request has led to a violation of the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy regarding yourself, please refer the case to the Ombuds commission.
If this page is displaying outdated contents even after you refresh the page in your browser, please purge this page's cache.
Requests[edit]
KMK from Myanmar[edit]
- KMK from Myanmar (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
[edit]
- TTL(Facebook) (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results[edit]
Reason: GPS coordinates points of photos from both TTL(Facebook) (talk · contribs), and KMK from Myanmar (talk · contribs) are pointing the exact same location. The views in photos are different (forest, plain, city, inside of building etc.), but the GPS coordinates is all the same. Probably they are the same user or they forged the metadata with the same method.
See more at Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems#Weird_Myanmar_military-related_swath_of_deletion_requests. Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 13:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Stale - Both accounts last edited in 2021. Handling will need to be based on behaviour. Эlcobbola talk 16:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Dnazf[edit]
- Dnazf (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
[edit]
- Tarkyldz (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results[edit]
Reason: The master account (Dnazf has limited contributions to Commons, but still manages to have several files deleted for copyright/licensing issues. Among these is Ergene nehri.jpg, which was uploaded while editing "Ergene" on tr.wikipedia.org. After the first file was deleted for licensing reasons, the sockpuppet (Tarkyldz re-uploaded the same file, but under a different name (File:Ergene.jpg).
Both the master and sock have contributions only to the Turkish Wikipedia and Commons. Among the 4 undeleted contributions of the master to the Turkish Wikipedia, one of them was to add the image in question to the "Ergene" article. The sockpuppet also has relatively few contributions on TrWiki, but several of them also added the same image (under the name of the re-upload) to the infobox of the "Ergene" article there.
For the above reasons, I suspect that there may be some connection between the two accounts. As such, I am requesting a CheckUser investigate whether a technical connection between the two exists. If connected, the use of the second account to re-upload a deleted image that the first account had already attempted to place on Commons would appear to evade scrutiny as to the account holder's compliance with the licensing policy.
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Unlikely. Эlcobbola talk 15:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Giorgio Pallavicini[edit]
- Giorgio Pallavicini (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
[edit]
- Fefecece (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results[edit]
Reason: Giorgio Pallavicini has been blocked on March 5th, 2023, because of massive overwriting of photos of portraits paintings and old portraits photos with "enhanced" versions obtained via AI. I've recently noticed that Giorgio Pallacivini, on the Italian Wikipedia (we are both Italian), is now changing in many biographies of aristocrats the main picture, substituting it with an AI "enhanced" version. All these pictures have been uploaded here by user Fecefece. This last one is blocked on the Italian Wikipedia as a sockpuppet, but apparently the admin forgot to put the template linking that profile to Giorgio Pallavicini (so there is not officially a prove that they are the same person). Just for the info, I was discussing about that topic with another user here on Commons, and Giorgio Pallavicini replied without login (but he signed).--Kaho Mitsuki (Dis-moi) 20:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Inconclusive --Krd 09:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Instant Edge[edit]
- Instant Edge (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
[edit]
- Instantedge1 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Pablo jomas (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results[edit]
Reason: Repeat spammer. See upload history of Instant edge.png, Instant Edge.png, Iedge-logo.png Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- For Instant Edge and Instantedge1, It looks like a duck to me. Technically Unrelated is Pablo jomas. Эlcobbola talk 16:10, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- For older requests, please see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Archives